|
|
|

Pelosi
attempts to justify funding for contraception in
economic stimulus package |
FROM:
www.catholicnewsagency.com
Washington DC, Jan 26, 2009 / 07:16 pm (CNA).- House Speaker
Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) in a Sunday interview tried to justify
the inclusion of hundreds of millions of dollars in funding
for contraceptives in the $825 billion economic stimulus
package by claiming family planning services “reduce cost.”
Speaker Pelosi made her comments in an appearance on ABC’s
This Week with host George Stephanopoulos. He asked how the
expansion of “family planning services” could be considered
an economic stimulus. The Speaker replied:
“Well, the family planning services reduce cost. They reduce
cost. The states are in terrible fiscal budget crises now
and part of what we do for children's health, education and
some of those elements are to help the states meet their
financial needs. One of those - one of the initiatives you
mentioned, the contraception, will reduce costs to the
states and to the federal government.”
Stephanopoulos responded, “So no apologies for that?”
“No apologies. No,” Speaker Pelosi replied. “We have to deal
with the consequences of the downturn in our economy.”
Speaker Pelosi is a self-described Catholic. However,
Catholic teaching considers contraceptive use an intrinsic
evil.
The “family planning services” in the stimulus package
“would expand federal funding for contraception through
Medicaid, allowing those not poor enough to be currently
eligible for Medicaid to nonetheless qualify for the
contraception aid,” reports CNSNews.com.
The article goes on to explain that the Clinton
administration created a program allowing individual states
to “seek a waiver to offer Medicaid ‘family planning’
services to those who are otherwise not qualified for
Medicaid.” Once the state receives the waiver, “the federal
government matches state Medicaid family planning funds with
$9 in federal money for every $1 the state spends.”
Under Pelosi’s provision, states would not need to apply for
the waiver to receive the 9-1 federal contraception funding.
CNSNews.com also reported that even the White House has
backed away from Pelosi saying that the family planning
provision was not President Obama’s idea.
Father Tom Euteneur of Human Life International also
criticized Speaker Pelosi’s economic reasoning. “She
presents as self-evident the idea that children are a
hindrance to improving states' economies. Lies don't become
truth by repeating them, they only become more acceptable,”
he commented to CNA.
“The problem is, however, that it is sick. We must never
reduce a human being to his or her economic value. The
Speaker is no more ‘Catholic’ than she is an economic
expert,” he charged.
“What she and her fellow anti-life crusaders are doing is
trying to sneak their destructive ideology into law by
convincing the ignorant that it is fiscally necessary,” he
continued. “‘Never waste a crisis,’ is how Rahm Emmanuel,
Obama's new Chief of Staff put it.
“When people are scared, they'll agree to almost anything
that is presented as a solution to their problem, even if,
as is the case here, it has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with
economic stimulus. This is an insult to both the
intelligence and the moral consciences of the people she is
supposed to represent.”
According to Father Euteneur, Russian demographics provide a
cautionary example. “Look at Russia, the birthplace of the
progressive ideal of widely available contraception and
abortion. Their birthrate is now the lowest in the developed
world. There are more abortions than live births in Russia
and they can't seem to change people's minds back to the
idea of having children.
“Their society is crumbling as the few young people they
have decide they don't want to pay for their elders' care,
or they simply leave. Russia, once the bright light of the
future for ‘progressives’, now is evidence of what this deep
spiritual illness does when it is allowed to run amok in a
formerly beautiful and rich Christian culture. Will we learn
from their example and reject contraception and abortion as
a solution to society's ills?”
He suggested that Planned Parenthood and its subsidies will
be the obvious beneficiaries of the contraceptive funding.
“You'll also see increased promotion of contraception in
state hospitals and in ‘education’ to young people in our
schools,” he predicted.
CNA also sought comment from Dr. William Luckey, former
chairman of the Political Science and Economics Department
at Christendom College and author of the CNA column
“Indispensible Economics.”
Luckey asked how long Speaker Pelosi expects the recession
to last. “Children conceived today will be born 9 months
from now. Does she think that the economy will be in
recession then? How can she tell? So even if these plans
went into effect today, which is impossible given the time
Congress takes to do anything, the economic downturn will
probably be reversed by then.”
He also stated that Speaker Pelosi appears to think that
children are an economic burden to society. He said the
number of children who use public services must be
considered, wagering that they are only “a small minority.”
In the long run, Dr. Luckey said, “most every child born now
grows up to be a positive contributor to society. People,
with rare exceptions, produce more than they consume. If you
cut back on the population, you cut back on production.”
He told CNA that many European countries are suffering
demographic decline from birth control policies.
Finally, he asked, “where is the logic that says that if you
take money from me to give to others so that they can have
sexual pleasure without taking responsibility for it, the
economy will be helped? Why not just let me keep my money in
the first place to spend on more valuable things for my
family?”
He called the contraception initiative “immoral” and
“completely based in ignorance.” “She is probably buying
votes from the birth control lobby—and abortion will be next
as a solution to our economic woes,” Dr. Luckey claimed.
- back to
Q & A --
|
|